HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Summary Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Egan, J. M. Articles by Margolskee, R. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Egan, J. M. Articles by Margolskee, R. F.

Taste Cells of the Gut and Gastrointestinal Chemosensation

¹ National Institute on Aging/National Institutes of Health, 5600 Nathan Shock Drive, Baltimore, MD 21224;
² Department of Neuroscience, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029

SUMMARY

Taste receptors, the taste G-protein gustducin, and downstream signaling elements known to underlie the detection and transduction of bitter, sweet, and umami (monosodium glutamate–containing) compounds in taste buds of the tongue are present also in specific endocrine cells of the gut: the enteroendocrine K and L cells. Glucose in the gut activates sweet taste receptors and gustducin present in the intestine’s enteroendocrine L cells, leading to secretion of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) from these cells. GLP-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) are incretin hormones, which augment insulin release from the beta cells of the pancreas. GLP-1, GIP, and other gut hormones released from the K and L cells affect insulin secretion, glucose homeostasis, nutrient absorption and other gut functions. Glucose transport into enterocytes via Na+,glucose cotransporter 1 (SGLT1) and GLUT2 appears to be regulated by the gustducin- and sweet receptor-expressing enteroendocrine cells. In response to sugar ingestion, knockout mice lacking gustducin show deficits in the release of GLP-1 and insulin, in glucose homeostasis, and in upregulation of SGLT1. Apparently, the gut "tastes" sugars and sweeteners in much the same way as does the tongue and by using many of the same signaling elements. Taste receptors and other taste signaling elements in gut may be contributors to obesity, diabetes, metabolic syndrome and other diet-related disorders. Gut-expressed taste elements are attractive targets for therapeutic intervention.

Humans consciously perceive only five distinct tastes: bitter, sweet, umami [the savory taste of monosodium glutamate (MSG)], salty, and sour. Taste cells of the tongue utilize G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs), the heterotrimeric G-protein gustducin, and downstream signaling cascades to detect bitter, sweet, and umami compounds. The mechanisms of salty and sour taste transduction are less certain but may utilize the epithelial sodium channel (ENaC), polycystic kidney disease (PKD) channels, transient receptor potential channel M5 (Trpm5), or other ion channels. Sugars, such as glucose and fructose, and non-caloric sweeteners, such as sucralose, activate the tongue’s heterodimeric T1R2+T1R3 sweet receptor, whereas MSG and other savory amino acids are detected by the T1R1+T1R3 heterodimer. Toxic plant alkaloids, such as strychnine and other bitter compounds, activate one or more of approximately thirty divergent T2R bitter receptors.

A number of researchers had speculated that chemosensory detection of glucose and other macronutrients in the lumen of the gut might utilize cells and receptors like those of the tongue (1). Indeed, in 1996 Höfer et al. showed that the taste cell–specific G-protein gustducin is also present in the gut of rodents (2). Subsequent studies during the past few years have shown that T1R sweet and umami taste receptors and T2R bitter taste receptors are present in the guts of rodents and humans. Only within the last year, however, have the functions in gut of these taste signaling elements been uncovered (3, 4). The gut "tastes" sugars and sweeteners in much the same way as does the tongue and by using many of the same signaling elements.

It has long been known that orally ingested glucose is much more effective than intravenous glucose in raising plasma insulin concentrations (this is called the incretin effect) (5) (Box 1). Glucose in the gut lumen leads to secretion, in a concentration-dependent manner, of incretins [the gut hormones glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP, also termed gastric inhibitory peptide)], which in turn augment insulin release from the pancreas. Yet, how glucose in the gut lumen stimulates release of incretins was not known until 2007: glucose in the gut activates sweet taste receptors and gustducin present in the intestine’s enteroendocrine L cells, leading to release of GLP-1 from these cells. Gustducin is also found in another subset of enteroendocrine cells—the K cells—which express GIP in response to food intake. A third set of enteroendocrine cells, the L/K cells, express both GLP-1 and GIP along with gustducin. GLP-1, GIP, and other gut hormones released from the K and L cells contribute to a wide variety of functions, including gut motility, nutrient absorption, insulin secretion and glucose homeostasis, whole body energy assimilation, satiety–hunger signaling, and cellular proliferation (6).

Box 1. Incretins The process of digesting food elicits release of hormones, termed incretins, from specialized endocrine cells of the gastrointestinal tract. Incretins positively modulate the amount of insulin released from the beta cells of the islets of Langerhans in the pancreas in response to rising blood glucose. Incretins also slow down the rate of gastric emptying and gut motility and have other effects outside of the pancreas that influence glucose homeostasis. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and gastric inhibitory peptide (GIP) are incretins whose activities are neutralized by dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP 4) present on endothelial cells in blood vessels, on lymphocytes, and in the circulation. An agonist of the GLP-1 receptor, called exenatide, that is not subject to DPP 4 degradation, is now available to treat type 2 diabetes, as is sitagliptin, a DPP 4 inhibitor.

 

Gustducin and taste-signaling elements are expressed selectively in K and L, and perhaps other, enteroendocrine cells but not in the more numerous enterocytes lining the gut that are directly involved in absorbing sugars and other nutrients released from digested food. However, the gustducin- and sweet receptor-expressing enteroendocrine cells appear to regulate glucose transport into enterocytes. Glucose and galactose enter enterocytes through the Na⁺, glucose cotransporter 1 (SGLT1), whereas fructose is absorbed through another apical transporter, GLUT5. The sugars then passively diffuse from the enterocytes into the bloodstream through GLUT2 in the enterocytes’ basal membranes. The amount of expression of SGLT1 in enterocytes is regulated by diet: high carbohydrate diets or supplementation with sugar- or sucralose-sweetened drinking water elevate SGLT1 expression and glucose-uptake capacity (4). Mice genetically modified to lack gustducin or T1R3 fail to increase SGLT1 expression or glucose uptake on a high sugar diet or when fed artificial sweeteners like sucralose, implicating these taste signaling elements in regulation of SGLT1. Glucose concentrations greater than 30 mM saturate SGLT1 transport capacity, and humans regularly consume more sugar over short time frames, such as in the 75 gram oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) or the 40 grams of sugar in cans of regular soft-drink than is possible to transport through SGLT1. Under those conditions, there is, within minutes, a large increase in the presence of GLUT2 in brush border membranes (BBM), thereby providing increased sugar diffusion capacity down a concentration gradient from the lumen into the enterocytes to match dietary intake. Indeed, gut-expressed taste receptors have been implicated in sugar-induced GLUT2 trafficking (7). Sugar in the diet stimulates taste signaling elements on enteroendocrine cells to promote release of their hormones—in turn, these hormones regulate the expression of SGLT1 and GLUT2 in enterocyte BBM (4, 8) (Figure 1).

View larger version (96K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Physiological consequences of activating gut taste cells. Enteroendocrine cells (orange comet-shaped cells) in gut villi have functional sweet and bitter taste receptors (not shown) at their apical (luminal) membranes. Sugars and other nutrients within the gut lumen activate the gut taste receptors leading to release of enteroendocrine cell hormones. The incretin hormones glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP), as well as other hormones (colored dots), are released from the basal surface of the enteroendocrine cells into the interstitial space, where they may act locally as paracrine factors, neurotransmitters and neuromodulators, or enter the blood stream and act as classical hormones at distal sites. Locally, the incretins and other enteroendocrine hormones elicit increased expression of the SGLT1 transporter and translocation of the GLUT2 transporter to the brush-border surface of the enterocytes, resulting in rapid absorption of glucose, galactose, and fructose. In addition, incretins activate afferent neurons in villi, sending signals to the central nervous system and influencing activity of the enteric nervous system. The enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase 4, present on epithelial cells of blood vessels, including those in the gut interstitium, and in the circulation, quickly degrades the biologically active forms of circulating incretins. Locally active incretins that are subject to less-rapid degradation may have a more prolonged duration of action.

Are taste receptors in gut relevant to diet-related disease and other public health issues? Could they serve as novel targets for new therapeutics? As is well known, obesity in the United States is rampant. In addition, the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome, a cluster of cardiovascular risk factors associated with type II diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and high blood pressure, is also increasing as a continuous variable (14, 15). Increased obesity and hyperlipidemia have been linked to increased consumption of sugary soft drinks (16–18); however, diet soft-drinks containing non-caloric sweeteners may further increase the incidence of obesity and/or metabolic syndrome (19–21). A rising prevalence of metabolic syndrome was found with increasing numbers of soft-drinks consumed: furthermore, the prevalence was even slightly higher, can-for-can, in the diet soft-drink drinkers vs regular soft-drink drinkers. Lutsey et al. found that the risk of developing metabolic syndrome was 34% higher in those drinking the most soft-drinks compared to those drinking the fewest. Other smaller studies have also reported associations of diet soft drinks with high blood pressure in women and weight gain in boys (22, 23). Is it something in the diet soda or is it a predisposing behavior of those consuming diet soft-drinks (e.g., unhealthy eating habits) that leads to increasing weight gain and metabolic syndrome? Rodent data suggest that sweeteners per se alter feeding behavior. Rats given low-energy saccharin-flavored gelatin overeat and become obese, relative to rats fed high-energy (starch) saccharin-flavored food (24). In a very recent study, rats receiving saccharin-sweetened yogurt gained more weight due to increased food intake than rats given sugar-sweetened yogurt (25). In light of all this human and animal data, caution is warranted against the television advertisements advocating addition of artificial sweetener instead of sugar to morning cereals for children.

Might the effects of non-caloric sweetener ingestion on metabolic syndrome and obesity be mediated in part by gut taste receptors? Non-caloric sweeteners do have many of the same effects on gut taste receptors as do energy-containing sugars: they each induce hormone release, increase SGLT1 expression, and induce GLUT2 translocation to the BBM (3, 4, 7). Ingestion of non-caloric sweeteners may prepare the gut for the presence of nutrients in the same manner as the nutrients themselves, but in the absence of a source of calories the balance between taste receptor activation, nutrient assimilation and appetite may be disequilibrated leading to an increase in appetite and overeating of unnecessary calories when they are readily available. Could it be that gut-bypass surgery leads to diminished appetite by bypassing the gut’s taste receptors? Two novel non-surgical therapeutic approaches come to mind. First, diabetes might be treated by activating the taste receptors on gut L cells so that they release GLP-1 to augment insulin release. Second, compounds that block activation of the gut’s taste receptors might serve as appetite suppressants. The potential of these approaches could readily be evaluated in animal studies using enteric-released sweeteners (e.g. sucralose) as activators and enteric-released sweetener antagonists (e.g. lactisole) as inhibitors of L cell taste receptors to, respectively, promote or inhibit release of GLP-1. Whereas a spoonful of sugar may act on the tongue’s taste buds to help the medicine go down, the actions of sweeteners and sweet antagonists in the gut may be therapeutic in their own right.

Josephine M. Egan, MD, is an Endocrinologist and chief of the Diabetes Section, in the Intramural program of the NIA/NIH. She studies incretins, specifically their mechanisms of release, mechanisms of action, and their role(s) in diabetes.

Robert F. Margolskee, MD, PhD, is Professor in the Department of Neuroscience, at the Mount Sinai School of Medicine. His research is focused on molecular mechanisms of taste signaling in tongue and chemosensation in gut. E-mail robert.margolskee{at}mssm.edu; fax 212-849-2599.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors are supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIA/NIH (JME) and grants from the NIH/NIDCD (RFM). The views expressed here are the authors’ own and do not reflect those of the NIH or DHHS. RFM has a personal financial interest in the form of stock ownership in the Redpoint Bio company, receives consulting fees from Redpoint Bio, and is an inventor on patents and patent applications which have been licensed to Redpoint Bio.

References

1. Fujita, T. Concept of paraneurons. Arch. Histol. Jpn. 40, 1–12 (1977).[Medline]
2. Höfer, D., Puschel, B., and Drenckhahn, D. Taste receptor-like cells in the rat gut identified by expression of alpha-gustducin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93, 6631–6634 (1996). This is the first manuscript showing that signaling molecules, normally found in taste cells, are also in the gut.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Jang, H.J., Kokrashvili, Z., Theodorakis, M.J. et al. Gut-expressed gustducin and taste receptors regulate secretion of glucagon-like peptide-1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 15069–15074 (2007). This manuscript showed that enteroendocrine L, L/K, and some K cells, in rodents and humans, express sweet taste receptors and their downstream molecules. When the taste receptors are activated they lead to hormone release by the same mechanisms that taste is appreciated in taste cells of tongue.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Margolskee, R.F., Dyer, J., Kokrashvili, Z. et al. T1R3 and gustducin in gut sense sugars to regulate expression of Na⁺-glucose cotransporter 1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 15075–15080 (2007). These authors provide evidence that taste receptors and their downstream signaling molecules are activated by sugar and sweeteners in the gut and they participate in the regulation of glucose transport into enterocytes.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. McIntyre, N., Holdsworth, C.D., and Turner, D.S. New interpretation of oral glucose tolerance. Lancet 2, 20–21 (1964). Data from these authors, and other investigators around the same time, showed that incretin factors actually existed because, as assays for insulin were now available, they could quantify the incretin response from the gut. Incretins are responsible for about 50% of the insulin secreted in response to oral glucose.[CrossRef][Medline]
6. Baggio, L.L. and Drucker, D.J. Biology of incretins: GLP-1 and GIP. Gastroenterology 132, 2131–2157 (2007). This is a comprehensive review of incretin physiology.[CrossRef][Medline]
7. Mace, O.J., Affleck, J., Patel, N., and Kellett, G.L. Sweet taste receptors in rat small intestine stimulate glucose absorption through apical GLUT2. J. Physiol. 582, 379–392 (2007). This study outlines the role of taste receptor activation on movement of the GLUT2 sugar transporter to the brush border membranes of the gut and as a consequence the rate of glucose transport into enterocytes becomes enhanced.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Au, A., Gupta, A., Schembri, P., Cheeseman, C.I. Rapid insertion of GLUT2 into the rat jejunal brush-border membrane promoted by glucagon-like peptide 2. Biochem. J. 367, 247–254 (2002).[CrossRef][Medline]
9. Wu, S.V., Rozengurt, N., Yang, M., Young, S.H., Sinnett-Smith, J., and Rozengurt, E. Expression of bitter taste receptors of the T2R family in the gastrointestinal tract and enteroendocrine STC-1 cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 2392–2397 (2002).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Rozengurt, N., Wu, S.V., Chen, M.C., Huang, C., Sternini, C., and Rozengurt, E. Colocalization of the alpha-subunit of gustducin with PYY and GLP-1 in L cells of human colon. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 291, G792–G802 (2006).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Chen, M.C., Wu, S.V., Reeve, J.R., Jr., and Rozengurt, E. Bitter stimuli induce Ca²⁺ signaling and CCK release in enteroendocrine STC-1 cells: Role of L-type voltage-sensitive Ca²⁺ channels. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 291, C726–C739 (2006). This manuscript showed indirect evidence for functioning bitter receptors in enteroendocrine cell lines.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Glendinning, J.I., Yiin, Y.M., Ackroff, K., and Sclafani, A. Intragastric infusion of denatonium conditions flavor aversions and delays gastric emptying in rodents. Physiol. Behav. Epub ahead of print; doi:10.1016/j. physbeh.2007.11.029 (2007).
13. Halatchev, I.G. and Cone, R.D. Peripheral administration of PYY(3-36) produces conditioned taste aversion in mice. Cell Metab. 1, 159–168 (2005).[CrossRef][Medline]
14. Ford, E.S., Giles, W.H., and Dietz, W.H. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among US adults: Findings from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. JAMA 287, 356–359 (2002).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Flegal, K.M., Carroll, M.D., Ogden, C.L., and Johnson, C.L. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2000. JAMA 288, 1723–1727 (2002).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. James, J., Thomas, P., Cavan, D., and Kerr, D. Preventing childhood obesity by reducing consumption of carbonated drinks: Cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ 328, 1237 (2004).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Schulze, M.B., Manson, J.E., Ludwig, D.S. et al. Sugar-sweetened beverages, weight gain, and incidence of type 2 diabetes in young and middle-aged women. JAMA 292, 927–934 (2004).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Parks, E.J. and Hellerstein, M.K. Carbohydrate-induced hypertriacylglycerolemia: Historical perspective and review of biological mechanisms. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 71, 412–433 (2000).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Fowler, S., Williams, K., Hunt, K., Resendez, R., Hazuda, H., and Stern, M. Diet soft drink consumption is associated with increased incidence of overweight and obesity in the San Antonio Heart Study. Diabetes 54, A258 (2005). This abstract was the first report that uncovered a link between being overweight and consumption of diet soft-drinks.
20. Dhingra, R., Sullivan, L., Jacques, P.F. et al. Soft drink consumption and risk of developing cardiometabolic risk factors and the metabolic syndrome in middle-aged adults in the community. Circulation 116, 480–488 (2007). This large epidemiological data-set from the Framingham Study uncovered a link between diet soft-drink consumption and the metabolic syndrome.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Lutsey, P.L., Steffen, L.M., and Stevens, J. Dietary intake and the development of the metabolic syndrome: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study. Circulation 117, 754–761 (2008). This study corroborated the findings of the Framingham researchers.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Winkelmayer, W.C., Stampfer, M.J., Willett, W.C., and Curhan, G.C. Habitual caffeine intake and the risk of hypertension in women. JAMA 294, 2330–2335 (2005).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Berkey, C.S., Rockett, H.R., Field, A.E., Gillman, M.W., and Colditz, G.A. Sugar-added beverages and adolescent weight change. Obes. Res. 12, 778–788 (2004).[Medline]
24. Pierce, W.D., Heth, C.D., Owczarczyk, J.C., Russell, J.C., and Proctor, S.D. Overeating by young obesity-prone and lean rats caused by tastes associated with low energy foods. Obesity (Silver Spring) 15, 1969–1979 (2007).[CrossRef][Medline]
25. Swithers, S.E. and Davidson, T.L. A role for sweet taste: Calorie predictive relations in energy regulation by rats. Behav. Neurosci. 122, 161–173 (2008). Purdue investigators reported that rats eating yogurt sweetened with saccharin ate more food and gained more weight that rats given yogurt sweetened with sugar.[CrossRef][Medline]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Wellendorph, L. D. Johansen, and H. Brauner-Osborne Molecular Pharmacology of Promiscuous Seven Transmembrane Receptors Sensing Organic Nutrients Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 2009; 76(3): 453 - 465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Abu-Hamdah, A. Rabiee, G. S. Meneilly, R. P. Shannon, D. K. Andersen, and D. Elahi The Extrapancreatic Effects of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 and Related Peptides J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2009; 94(6): 1843 - 1852. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Kim and J. M. Egan The Role of Incretins in Glucose Homeostasis and Diabetes Treatment Pharmacol. Rev., December 1, 2008; 60(4): 470 - 512. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Summary Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Egan, J. M. Articles by Margolskee, R. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Egan, J. M. Articles by Margolskee, R. F.