MI Sign Up for eTOC Alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Molecular Interventions 6:20-22, (2006)
© American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
10.1124/mi.6.1.4
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schmid, T.
Right arrow Articles by Young, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schmid, T.
Right arrow Articles by Young, M. R.

Viewpoint

Lights on for Low Oxygen: A Noninvasive Mouse Model Useful for Sensing Oxygen Deficiency

Tobias Schmid and Matthew R. Young

Laboratory of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute-Frederick, Maryland 21702

SUMMARY

In vitro experimentation is valuable as a precursor to in vivo research; however, as we all know too well, not every in vitro finding leads to confirmation in vivo. In fact, conflicting results often occur because in vitro experiments lack all the necessary factors that impinge upon normal physiology in live animals. We are fortunate when in vivo models can be created that allow for direct observation of pharmacological effects. Kaelin and colleagues have created a mouse line that expresses the oxygen-dependent degradation domain (ODD) of hypoxia-induced factor-1{alpha} (HIF-1{alpha}) fused to the common firefly luciferase gene, under the control of a promoter that ensures organism-wide expression. In conditions of normoxia, the protein is quickly degraded, but in hypoxic situations, the protein is not degraded and administration of substrate illuminates the areas of expression. This technique allows for the observation of the effects of agents on oxygen tension in particular organs. Implicit is the adaptability of this model, wherein other promoters (e.g., tissue-specific) can be utilized or other disease models can be studied.

Recent advancements in clinical imaging, including magnetic resonance imagine (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET) and computed axial tomography (CAT), as well as those in molecular imaging, including bioluminescence (e.g., luciferase) and fluorescence (e.g., various fluorescent proteins) have provided the means to study complex biological processes in vivo and in real time, without compromising patients, animals, or data collection.

Optical imaging from bioluminescent or fluorescent proteins expressed in cells or tissues is the most widely used method for real time imaging. The genes encoding firefly luciferase or fluorescent proteins can either be fused with cis regulatory elements to monitor gene regulation events or within the coding sequence of a target gene to monitor protein-protein interactions. These engineered genes are then put into mice, which subsequently found a transgenic mouse line, thus allowing for organ- or organism-wide expression and study. To detect the fluorescent proteins, these reporters only need to be excited by light; however, the detection of the fluorescent proteins is restricted because of the limited penetration of the excitation light and the absorption of the emitted fluorescence. To detect the light emitted by luciferase protein, the animals are injected with luciferin, the non-light emitting substrate that after enzymatic action emits light, just prior to imaging. The advantage of luciferase is that the light emitted from deep tissues can easily be detected; however, such bioluminescence is not easily distinguished with regard to which cells or even which tissues are emitting the light. On the other hand, both bioluminescence and fluorescence in vivo can be repeatedly analyzed quantitatively in real time [see (1) for a more extensive overview].

The occurrence of hypoxic regions is a common feature of various physiological and pathophysiological conditions. Hypoxia occurs in tissue that is blocked from the blood supply resulting in a lack of nutrients, oxygen, and ischemia. In addition, actively growing tumors develop hypoxic sites because blood flow to the center of these tumors is often restricted (2, 3). The hypoxic stimulus provokes adaptive processes on multiple levels. Individual cells redistribute their metabolic enzyme composition towards anaerobic metabolism, and the amounts of glycolytic enzymes and glucose transporters in hypoxic cells and tissues are increased. Neovascularization, as indicated by the increased expression of vascular endothelial growth factor, occurs in the region close to the hypoxic tissue, whereas erythropoiesis, marked by the induction of erythropoietin (EPO) expression, is an organism-wide effect.

Many of the responses to hypoxia are facilitated by the induction of a major transcription factor: the hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) (4, 5). HIF is a heterodimer consisting of the stable, constitutively expressed aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator (ARNT) and an unstable, regulated {alpha}-subunit. There are three isoforms of the {alpha}-subunit. HIF-1{alpha} and HIF-2{alpha} are activators of transcription, whereas HIF-3{alpha} appears to act as a negative regulator of HIF activity (6, 7). The predominant isoform, HIF-1{alpha}, is ubiquitously expressed and its role in the physiological response to hypoxia was characterized over a decade ago (8).

Detrimental scenarios such as hypoxia require an immediate response. Consequently, the regulation of the transcription factor involved in regulating these assaults must be finely tuned and instantaneous. Because HIF-1{alpha} is constitutively expressed, activation is quickly obtained by posttranslational modification. Under conditions that include physiological concentrations of oxygen, HIF-1{alpha} is hydroxylated at two proline residues (402 and 564) by specific prolyl-4-hydroxylases (PHD), which are members of the EGLN (egg-laying nine homologous) protein family (9, 10). Hydroxylation at these prolines allows the E3 ubiquitin ligase pVHL (von Hippel Lindau protein) to bind and to ubiquitinate HIF-1{alpha} and thereby mark it for proteasomal degradation, thus keeping the HIF-1{alpha} protein amounts low. The PHDs are the oxygen sensors for HIF-1{alpha} regulation, requiring dioxygen for the hydroxylation of HIF-1{alpha}. A decrease in oxygen levels results in a loss of PHD activity and an accumulation of non-hydroxylated, non-ubiquitinated HIF-1{alpha}. The stabilization of HIF-1{alpha} allows dimerization with ARNT, which elicits its transcriptional activity (Figure 1Go). More details of the PHD-mediated regulation of HIF-1 have been discussed in recent reviews (1114).


Figure 1
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Oxygen concentration-dependent regulation of HIF-1{alpha}. Under normoxic conditions (and in the presence of 2-OG and Fe2+)HIF-1{alpha} is hydroxylated at two proline residues by specific prolyl-4-hydroxylases (PHDs) which allows the E3 ubiquitin ligase pVHL to bind to HIF-1{alpha} and mark it for proteasomal degradation. In addition, HIF-1{alpha} is regulated by the aspargine hydroxylase factor inhibiting HIF-1 (FIH-1) in the C-terminal transactivation domain (C-TAD), which inhibits p300/CBP binding to HIF-1{alpha} (20). If oxygen concentrations decrease, the PHDs and FIH-1 are inactivated because of the limited oxygen supply. This inactivation allows HIF-1{alpha} to accumulate, form the active transcription factor HIF-1 with the {alpha}-subunit, recruit transcriptional cofactors, and initiate the transcription of responsive genes. HIF-1, hypoxia-inducible factor; pVHL, von Hippel Lindau protein; ARNT, aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator; ODD, oxygen-dependent degradation domain; 2-OG, 2-oxoglutarate.

 
The involvement of HIF-1{alpha} in various disease states (Table 1Go) makes it a prominent target for drug design studies (1517). The ability to assess the effects drugs have on HIF-1{alpha} protein amounts or on HIF-1 activity, therefore, represents an interesting tool for drug design studies. Indeed, to do so in vivo would be extremely useful for evaluating the tissue and target specificity of the individual drug or event.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. (Patho-) Physiological Situations Associated with Increased HIF-1 Activity
 
Safran et al. (18) have reasoned that because the HIF-1 PHDs are the key oxygen sensors and can respond immediately to a decrease in oxygen levels, that a reporter of PHD activity would be valuable for monitoring oxygen availability and would facilitate the development of pro- or anti-angiogenic compounds. To this end they engineered a mouse model that expresses the oxygen-dependent degradation (ODD) domain of HIF-1{alpha} fused to the firefly luciferase gene. Fusing the ODD domain to luciferase renders the luciferase protein sensitive to oxygen-dependent hydroxylation and subsequent ubiquitin-dependent degradation under normal physiological circumstances. To ensure the widespread expression of the fusion protein, the ODD-Luc cDNA was integrated into the ROSA26 locus, which is expressed in most tissues.

In cell culture, the ODD-Luc fusion protein is responsive to hypoxia and hypoxia mimetics. In vivo, in normal oxygen concentrations, the ROSA26/ODD-Luc mice emitted significantly less light then mice that express wild-type luciferase under the control of the same ROSA26 promoter, indicating that the fusion protein was sensitive to ODD-mediated degradation. The light emitted from the ROSA26/ODD-Luc mice was detected in the region of the kidneys, which is consistent with their finding that mammals breathing room air possess hypoxic zones in their kidneys (18). When the ROSA26/ODD-Luc mice were placed in low oxygen, the emission of light increased 5- to 10-fold relative to mice breathing room air. Previously, detection of PHD activity or stabilization of HIF-1 under similar conditions had not been possible.

Preclinical studies indicate that increasing HIF-1 activity might be beneficial to prevent tissue hypoxia that arises from myocardial infarctions or stroke (19). The ROSA26/ODD-Luc mice are ideally suited for identifying and characterizing small molecule inhibitors of PHD that would increase HIF-1 activity. Indeed, Safran et al. showed that treatment of animals with FG-4383, an inhibitor of the PHDs, resulted in a rapid and dose-dependent increase in bioluminescence from these mice (18). FG-4383-induced bioluminescence was greatest in the regions of the kidney. In agreement with the luciferase results, treatment of ROSA26/ODD-Luc mice with FG-4383 increased HIF-1-mediated expression of EPO mRNA in the kidneys and circulating concentrations of EPO protein in the blood.

Safran et al. concluded that, unlike traditional invasive methods of harvesting tissue or serum, the ROSA26/ODD-Luc mice can provide a rapid non-invasive measurement of possible agonists of HIF-1 activity (18). Furthermore, given that multiple time and dose determinants can be measured with the same animal, the ROSA26/ODD-Luc mice are useful for generating spatial and temporal information. The ROSA26/ODD-Luc should also be useful for monitoring hypoxic regions of solid tumors of cancer-prone mouse strains. In this case the bioluminescence would be used to report increases in HIF-1{alpha} which are associated with increased angiogenesis and a poor prognosis.

The ROSA26/ODD-Luc mice are a valuable addition to the rapidly growing list of genetically engineered mice designed to report biological functions. The ability of these mice to rapidly report, in a non-invasive manner, the effects of potential drugs capable of regulating these functions, opens up a new and exciting future for identifying and characterizing these compounds in vivo.


Figure 2
Tobias Schmid, PhD, is a postdoctoral fellow in the Laboratory of Cancer Prevention (LCP) at the National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland. He received his PhD from the University of Kaiserslautern, Germany, in 2004, where he was working on hypoxia-induced signaling mechanisms. In 2005 he joined, the LCP where he is working on the transformation repressor Pdcd4. E-mail: Tschmid{at}ncifcrf.gov; fax 301 846-6907.


Figure 3
Matthew R. Young, PhD, is a Staff Scientist in the Laboratory of Cancer Prevention at the National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland. He received his PhD in Biochemistry from the University of Maryland School of Medicine. After a postdoctoral fellowship at ABL-Basic Research Program at the NCI-Frederick, he joined Nancy Colburn’s lab. In 2000 he was promoted to Staff Scientist in the LCP where he is working on developing mouse models engineered to image the early events of carcinogenesis. E-mail: Youngm{at}ncifcrf.gov; fax 301 846-6907.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research.

References

  1. Gross, S. and Piwnica-Worms, P. Spying on cancer: Molecular imaging in vivo with genetically encoded reporters. Cancer Cell 7, 5–15 (2005). This is an excellent summary of recent molecular imaging methods used in in vivo systems.[Medline]
  2. Paul, S.A., Simons, J.W., and Mabjeesh, N.J. HIF at the crossroads between ischemia and carcinogenesis. J. Cell Physiol. 200, 20–30 (2004).[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Ikeda, E. Cellular response to tissue hypoxia and its involvement in disease progression. Pathol. Int. 55, 603–610 (2005).[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Semenza, G.L. HIF-1, O2, and the 3 PHDs: How animal cells signal hypoxia to the nucleus. Cell 107, 1–3 (2001).[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Lee, J.W., Bae, S.H., Jeong, J.W., Kim, S.H., and Kim, K.W. Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF-1){alpha}: Its protein stability and biological functions. Exp. Mol. Med. 36, 1–12 (2004).[Medline]
  6. Asikainen, T.M., Ahmad, A., Schneider, B.K., Ho, W.B., Arend, M., Brenner, M., Gunzler, V., and White, C.W. Stimulation of HIF-1{alpha}, HIF-2{alpha}, and VEGF by prolyl 4-hydroxylase inhibition in human lung endothelial and epithelial cells. Free Radic. Biol. Med 38, 1002–1013 (2005).[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Maynard, M.A., Evans, A.J., Hosomi, T., Hara, S., Jewett, M.A., and Ohh, M. Human HIF-3{alpha}4 is a dominant-negative regulator of HIF-1 and is down-regulated in renal cell carcinoma. FASEB J. 19, 1396–1406 (2005).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Wang, G.L. and Semenza, G.L. General involvement of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 in transcriptional response to hypoxia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90, 4304–4308 (1993). This was the first report on the presence and biological function of HIF-1.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Epstein, A.C., Epstein, A.C., Gleadle, J.M., McNeill, L.A. et al. C. elegans EGL-9 and mammalian homologs define a family of dioxygenases that regulate HIF by prolyl hydroxylation. Cell 107, 43–54 (2001). These authors were among the first to report that the oxygen-dependent stability regulation of HIF-1{alpha} is facilitated by the action of the proline-4 hydroxylases.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Bruick, R.K. and McKnight, S.L. A conserved family of prolyl-4-hydroxy-lases that modify HIF. Science 294, 1337–1340 (2001). This was the second pioneering paper to describe the function of the HIF-1 PHDs.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Hirota, K. and Semenza, G.L. Regulation of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 by prolyl and asparaginyl hydroxylases. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 338, 610–616 (2005).[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Kaelin, W.G., Jr. The von Hippel-Lindau protein, HIF hydroxylation, and oxygen sensing. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 338, 627–638 (2005).[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Schofield, C.J. and Ratcliffe, P.J. Signalling hypoxia by HIF hydroxylases. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 338, 617–626 (2005).[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Fedele, A.O., Whitelaw, M.L., and Peet, D.J. Regulation of gene expression by the hypoxia-inducible factors. Mol. Interv. 2, 229–243 (2002).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Semenza, G.L. Targeting HIF-1 for cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 3, 721–732 (2003). This review elaborately discusses the involvement of HIF-1 in cancer biology and potential mechanisms to intervene.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Hewitson, K.S. and Schofield, C.J. The HIF pathway as a therapeutic target. Drug Discov. Today 9, 704–711 (2004).[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Belozerov, V.E. and Van Meir, E.G. Hypoxia inducible factor-1: A novel target for cancer therapy. Anticancer Drugs 16, 901–909 (2005). This review presents the recent efforts taken to target HIF-1 in cancer therapy.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Safran, M., Kim, W.Y., O’Connell, F., Flippin, L., Gunzler, V., Horner, J.W., Depinho, R.A., and Kaelin, W.G., Jr. Mouse model for noninvasive imaging of HIF prolyl hydroxylase activity: Assessment of an oral agent that stimulates erythropoietin production. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 105–110 (2006). The article this Viewpoint is primarily based on.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Ivan, M., Haberberger, T., Gervasi, D.C. et al. Biochemical purification and pharmacological inhibition of a mammalian prolyl hydroxylase acting on hypoxia-inducible factor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 13459–13464 (2002).[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Lando, D., Peet, D.J., Gorman, J.J., Whelan, D.A., Whitelaw, M.L., and Bruick, R.K. FIH-1 is an asparaginyl hydroxylase enzyme that regulates the transcriptional activity of hypoxia-inducible factor. Genes Dev. 16, 1466–1471 (2002). These authors described for the first time the additional hydroxylation site of HIF-1{alpha} at N803, which is responsible for controlling its transcriptional activity.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schmid, T.
Right arrow Articles by Young, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schmid, T.
Right arrow Articles by Young, M. R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPET Journals Pharmacological Reviews Drug Metabolism and Disposition
Molecular Interventions Molecular Pharmacology J Pharmacology and Exp Therapeutics
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.