MI Visit the ASPET Website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Molecular Interventions 4:197-199, (2004)
© American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
10.1124/mi.4.4.3
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eilers, H.
Right arrow Articles by Schumacher, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eilers, H.
Right arrow Articles by Schumacher, M. A.

Viewpoint

Opioid-induced Respiratory Depression: Are 5-HT4a Receptor Agonists the Cure?

Helge Eilers1 and Mark A. Schumacher1,2

1 Departments of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, and
2 Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, 94143

SUMMARY

µ-Opioid receptor agonists are commonly utilized as analgesics for treatment of acute pain and some chronic pain syndromes. In addition to their outstanding effectiveness, opioids, unfortunately, promote respiratory depression. Indeed, opioid–induced respiratory depression can result in hypoventilation and neurologic injury, and may arise as a consequence of µ-opioid receptor–mediated blockade of specialized respiratory neurons in the brainstem. Manzke and coworkers have suggested that the serotonin receptor subtype 5-HT4a (5-HT4aR) could serve as a useful therapeutic target for the treatment or prevention of opioid–induced respiratory depression. This hypothesis derives from the finding that the 5-HT4aR and the µ-opioid receptors affect the intracellular concentration of cyclic AMP in opposing ways. The findings are a significant milestone in ongoing efforts to understand the analgesia–ventilation link.

Since ancient times, physicians have faced the clinical dilemma of how to relieve a patient’s pain and suffering without doing additional harm. Although modern anesthesia and pain management have led the way in refining our use of opioid analgesics and developing exciting techniques of neural blockade, current therapies often remain inadequate to control severe debilitating pain. Illustrating this problem, a recently published survey assessing the prevalence of pain in the US finds 57% of adults have experienced chronic or recurrent pain in the last year, and 84% of those who suffered pain said they would rate their pain from moderate to severe (1). Consequently, almost six out of ten persons surveyed responded that they would be willing to pay more taxes to increase federal funding for scientific research into the causes and treatment of pain (1). Moreover, physicians are now compelled to properly treat a patient’s complaints of pain or risk both ethical and legal sanctions (2). Opioid analgesics, in particular µ-opioid receptor agonists, continue to be the mainstay of treatment for acute pain, acute postoperative pain, and are also widely used in the treatment of various chronic pain syndromes. However, unwanted side effects including central nervous system depression, with associated respiratory depression, can severely limit the physician’s ability to manage acute and chronic pain states even if adequate pain relief has been achieved. Independent of the route of administration (e.g., transdermal, transmucosal, subcutaneous, im, iv, epidural, or intrathecal), opioid-induced respiratory depression leading to hypoventilation and hypoxemia has produced irreversible neurologic injury and death and therefore remains one of the most serious complications in perioperative care (3). Evidence from experiments in animals suggests that the mechanism is a consequence of µ-opioid receptor–mediated blockade of specialized respiratory neurons in the brainstem (4). Although {delta}-opioid receptors have been investigated as an alternate therapeutic target in an attempt to separate a desired analgesic effect from opioid-induced respiratory depression, the data are not yet conclusive on the role of these receptor subtypes [for a recent review of the different opioid receptor types see (5)]. In addition, other therapeutic strategies that seek to reduce opioid dose requirements but retain analgesic efficacy are under investigation, such as using small doses of ketamine to counteract opioid-induced tolerance and hyperalgesia (6). Among the most exciting developments in this area of research is a study recently reported by Manzke and coworkers (7), who investigated the potential of the serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) receptor subtype 5-HT4a (5-HT4aR) as a therapeutic target for the treatment or prevention of opioid-induced respiratory depression. Manzke and colleagues hypothesized that a 5-HT4aR–selective agonist might function to oppose µ-opioid receptor–mediated respiratory depression. This hypothesis is based on the fact that both the 5-HT4aR and the µ-opioid receptors belong to a family of G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs) that can modulate the concentration of adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate (cAMP): stimulation of 5-HT4aR increases intracellular cAMP concentrations whereas µ-opioid receptor stimulation decreases cAMP concentrations. In addition, both receptors appear to have overlapping expression patterns especially in the pre-Bötzinger complex (PBC), an area in the brainstem that contains respiratory neurons controlling respiratory rate. Although their hypothesis is compelling, there are several important considerations that must be addressed to both confirm and translate the observations made by Manzke and colleagues into a clinically relevant therapeutic strategy.

5-HT is a critical neurotransmitter that plays a key role in controlling a large variety of sensory and motor functions. Its effects are mediated through 5-HT receptors, of which seven distinct families (5-HT1–7R) exist. Except for 5-HT3R, which acts as a ligand-gated ion channel, all 5-HT receptors belong to the family of GPCRs although they do not share the same second messenger system [for a comprehensive review see (8)]. 5-HT4aRs, which occur as the alternately spliced species 5-HT4a–e, have a wide tissue distribution that includes the brain, gut, and the heart, as demonstrated through radioligand binding studies (9). Manzke and colleagues (7) provide immunohistochemical evidence that the 5-HT4aR isoform is expressed in the ventrolateral medulla and they interpret their multilabeling results as proof of expression in respiratory neurons of the PBC. 5-HT4Rs have also been consistently found in the nigrostriatal and mesolimbic systems of the brain (10). Outside the brain, significant expression of 5-HT4aR has been described in the atrium (but not in the ventricle of the heart) and in the gastrointestinal tract. These observations together with the data provided by Manzke et al. support a contribution of 5-HT4R–mediated effects not only to respiratory pattern generation, but also to a wide variety of physiologic functions including memory and learning, anxiety and depression, heart rate control, and gut motility. Because the effects on memory and learning as well as anxiety and depression are difficult to assess in animal studies, thorough investigation in human subjects will be necessary. At this point, there are not enough data to predict the side-effect profile of 5-HT4R agonists in humans. In addition, it is unclear just how specific BIMU8, the agonist used by Manzke and coworkers, is for the 5-HT4R. Several investigations suggest that BIMU8 is a nonselective agonist, and, in particular, has effects on 5-HT3Rs, and furthermore, facilitates both dopamine and acetylcholine release in rat brain (9, 11, 12). There is ample evidence from earlier studies that supports the involvement of serotoninergic receptors of different subtypes in modulation of respiratory activity (1315). Experimental use of newly described 5-HT4R agonists (i.e., TS-951) and antagonists will help to further distinguish the roles of 5-HT4R-specific and other receptor subtype-specific effects on ventilation (16, 17). In addition, it will be necessary to determine whether any of the investigated compounds have intrinsic pro- or antinociceptive properties. For example, although not conclusive, there is evidence that BIMU8 has analgesic properties, at least at high concentrations (1113, 18). In order to confirm the hypothesized mechanism that a 5-HT4aR agonist-mediated increase in cAMP is the basis of reversal of opioid-induced respiratory depression, it would be very powerful to demonstrate the 5-HT4aR-specific reversal of opioid-induced reduction of neuronal activity at the single-cell level. Manzke and colleagues provide whole-cell recording data from a single inspiratory neuron and provide single-cell RT-PCR results (7); however, they do not demonstrate the opioid effect on respiratory activity at the single-cell level. In our view, this experiment would not only undoubtedly establish the mechanism of opioid-induced respiratory depression, but also provide the basis to test the importance of GPCRs on regulating cAMP concentrations as a basis for treatment of opioid-induced respiratory depression. Because 5-HT4aR agonists like BIMU8 reverse respiratory depression––presumably by increasing cAMP concentrations, as demonstrated by Manzke et al.––one would expect that this effect could be imitated by other agents that also increase cAMP in the same model system. Furthermore, it should be possible to use available 5-HT4aR–selective antagonists or other agents that decrease the concentration of cAMP to produce depression of neuronal activity that mimics the opioid-induced effects on inspiratory neurons.

Despite these concerns, there remains ample evidence to support the hypothesis put forward by Manzke and colleagues (7). Their study has been widely received with the appropriate enthusiasm. As mentioned earlier, there is indeed a great need to improve patient safety during opioid treatment and also to make pain therapy more effective. Finding a cure for opioid-induced respiratory depression would certainly be a tremendous improvement. However, it may be premature to announce a major breakthrough, because the mechanism has not been clearly identified and there is no data yet on the feasibility of this approach in patients. Developing highly selective 5-HT4aR agonists would likely provide very promising tools to further clarify the cellular mechanisms of respiratory control. These new agonists might become potential candidates for therapeutic interventions.


Helge Eilers, MD, is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco. He received his MD at the University of Bonn, Germany and completed his anesthesia residency training at UCSF. He collaborates with MAS in the study of the molecular biology and physiology of pain transduction in the peripheral nociceptor. His research focuses on the study of ion channel physiology, in particular ion channels involved in mechanotransduction as well as the study of subunit interactions. Please address correspondence to HE. E-mail eilersh{at}anesthesia.ucsf.edu; fax 415-514-0185.


Mark A. Schumacher, PhD, MD, is an Associate Professor in the Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care and holds a joint appointment in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of California, San Francisco. MAS received his PhD in Physiology and Pharmacology as well as his MD from the University of California, San Diego. After an anesthesia residency and a pain research fellowship both at UCSF he joined the faculty UCSF Medical School. In addition to serving as an attending on the acute pain management service, he is leading a research team to investigate the molecular biology and physiology of pain transduction in the peripheral nociceptor.

References

  1. Peter D. Hart Research Associates. America Speaks: Pain in America. http://www.researchamerica.org/polldata/Pain_poll_report.pdf (2003).
  2. Hamdy, R.C. The decade of pain control and research. South. Med. J. 94, 753–754 (2001).[Medline]
  3. Motamed, C., Spencer, A., Farhat, F., Bourgain, J.L., Lasser, P., and Jayr, C. Postoperative hypoxaemia: Continuous extradural infusion of bupivacaine and morphine vs patient-controlled analgesia with intravenous morphine. Br. J. Anaesth. 80, 742–747 (1998). A prospective clinical study demonstrating the risk of post-operative hypoxemia with opioid administration using either patient-controlled analgesia or epidural route.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Takeda, S., Eriksson, L.I., Yamamoto, Y., Joensen, H., Onimaru, H., and Lindahl, S.G. Opioid action on respiratory neuron activity of the isolated respiratory network in newborn rats. Anesthesiology 95, 740–749 (2001). Demonstrates for the first time that µ- and {kappa}-opioid agonists inhibit mainly the inspiratory neurons in the brain stem.[Medline]
  5. Fields, H. State-dependent opioid control of pain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 5, 565–575 (2004).[Medline]
  6. Mao, J., Price, D.D., Lu, J., and Mayer, D.J. Antinociceptive tolerance to the µ-opioid agonist DAMGO is dose-dependently reduced by MK-801 in rats. Neuroscience Letters, 250, 193–196 (1998).[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Manzke, T., Guenther, U., Ponimaskin, E.G., Haller, M., Dutschmann, M., Schwarzacher, S., and Richter, D.W. 5-HT4a receptors avert opioid-induced breathing depression without loss of analgesia. Science 301, 226–229 (2003). This paper is the primary research article over which the Viewpoint is based.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Barnes, N.M. and Sharp, T. A review of central 5-HT receptors and their function. Neuropharmacology 38, 1083–1152 (1999).[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Eglen, R.M., Wong, E.H., Dumuis, A. and Bockaert, J. Central 5-HT4 receptors. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 16, 391–398 (1995). Concise review that integrates the pharmacology of 5-HT4Rs (including the selective agonist BIMU8) and their CNS distribution.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Waeber, C., Sebben, M., Grossman, C., Javoy-Agid, F., Bockaert, J., and Dumuis, A. [3H]-GR113808 labels 5-HT4 receptors in the human and guinea-pig brain. Neuroreport 4, 1239–1242 (1993).[Medline]
  11. Ghelardini, C., Galeotti, N., Casamenti, F., Malmberg-Aiello, P., Pepeu, G., Gualtieri, F., and Bartolini, A. Central cholinergic antinociception induced by 5HT4 agonists: BIMU 1 and BIMU 8. Life Sci. 58, 2297–2309 (1996). Suggests a broader spectrum of action for BIMU8 than only on respiratory neurons.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Espejo, E.F. and Gil, E. Antagonism of peripheral 5-HT4 receptors reduces visceral and cutaneous pain in mice, and induces visceral analgesia after simultaneous inactivation of 5-HT3 receptors. Brain Res. 788, 20–24 (1998).[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Millhorn, D.E., Eldridge, F.L., Waldrop, T.G., and Klingler, L.E. Centrally and peripherally administered 5-HTP have opposite effects on respiration. Brain Res. 264, 349–354 (1983).[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Morin, D., Hennequin, S., Monteau, R., and Hilaire, G. Serotonergic influences on central respiratory activity: An in vitro study in the newborn rat. Brain Res. 535, 281–287 (1990). Early study demonstrating that 5-HT1 and 5-HT2 receptor subtypes are involved in respiratory control.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Lalley, P.M., Bischoff, A.M., and Richter, D.W. Serotonin1A-receptor activation suppresses respiratory apneusis in the cat. Neurosci. Lett. 172, 59–62 (1994).[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Kajita, S., Ito, C., Kawamura, R., Yasuda, S., Isobe, Y., and Fukushima, K. Pharmacological characterization of a novel 5-HT4 receptor agonist, TS-951, in vitro. Pharmacology 63, 8–16 (2001).[Medline]
  17. Suzuki, M., Ohuchi, Y., Asanuma, H., Kaneko, T., Yokomori, S., Ito, C., Isobe, Y., and Muramatsu, M. Synthesis and evaluation of novel 2-oxo-1,2-dihydro-3-quinolinecarboxamide derivatives as potent and selective serotonin 5-HT4 receptor agonists. Chem. Pharm. Bull. (Tokyo) 49, 29–39 (2001).
  18. Doak, G.J. and Sawynok, J. Formalin-induced nociceptive behavior and edema: Involvement of multiple peripheral 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor subtypes. Neuroscience 80, 939–949 (1997). Presents evidence that 5HT4Rs are involved in the control of peripheral nociception.[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
K. T. S. Pattinson
Opioids and the control of respiration
Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2008; 100(6): 747 - 758.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eilers, H.
Right arrow Articles by Schumacher, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eilers, H.
Right arrow Articles by Schumacher, M. A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPET Journals Pharmacological Reviews Drug Metabolism and Disposition
Molecular Interventions Molecular Pharmacology J Pharmacology and Exp Therapeutics
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.