|
|
||||||||
Viewpoint |
University of Minnesota, Hormel Institute, Austin, MN 55912
SUMMARY
Several distinct mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways have been identified, including the extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 and 2 (ERK 1-2), p38, ERK5, and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) cascades. Given that crosstalk exists between intracellular signaling "pathways," it seems obvious that some level of regulation must exist to prevent competing (or parallel) signals from sending conflicting (or amplified) signals to downstream effectors. New evidence suggests that the JNK pathway inhibits signaling by the ERK pathway by uncoupling ERK from its upstream activator MEK (MAPK/ERK kinase), thereby promoting JNK-mediated signals to the transcriptional activator c-Jun. Does the JNK pathway function to inhibit ERK signals in general, or is this a cell type-specific phenomenon?
The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signal transduction network comprises a highly interactive series of protein kinases. These protein kinases convey, amplify, and integrate signals from the variety of diverse extracellular stimuli received at the cells surface. The net result may include cellular responses such as proliferation, differentiation, development, inflammation, or apoptosis. The most thoroughly characterized subgroups of the MAPK family include the extracellular signalregulated protein kinases (ERKs), the c-Jun N-terminal kinases/stress-activated protein kinases (JNKs/SAPKs), and the p38 family of kinases. Activated MAPKs translocate to the nucleus, where they phosphorylate a variety of target transcription factors. All three groups of MAPKs are activated by dual phosphorylation at Thr-X-Tyr motifs within the activation loop of the kinase domain by one or more MAPK kinases (MAPKKs, or MKKs) also known as MAPK/ERK kinases (MEKs). MEKs are, in turn, activated by MEK kinases (MEKKs, or MAPKKKs). Thus, each MAPK cascade actually consists of three sequential kinase reactions, which are known to result in the activation of other molecules including additional protein kinases and various transcription factors (Figure 1
). ERKs participate in transmitting signals initiated by tumor promoters, such as phorbol esters, and growth factors, including epidermal growth factor (EGF) and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) (1, 2 ). On the other hand, various forms of inflammatory signals or stress, including UV irradiation, reportedly activate JNKs and p38s (3).
|
Shen et al. recently observed in COS-7 cells that prolonged activation of JNKs by overexpressed mixed lineage kinase-3 (MLK3) results in decreased EGF-mediated activation of ERK1 and 2 (8). The MLKs are a family of at least seven serinethreonine protein kinases that act as MAPKKKs (i.e., MEKKs) to activate the JNKs and p38 pathways (9). MLK3, the most well-studied family member, contains a Gly-Prorich N terminus and a leucine zipper region that is required for its dimerization, which, in turn, is required for MLK3-mediated activation of JNKs (9, 10 ). Additionally, MLK3 contains a Src-homology (SH3) domain, which binds to proteins containing proline-rich sequences (9, 11 ). Shen et al. (8) present data showing that expression of active MLK3 in COS-7 cells inhibits EGF- or 12-O -tetradecanoyl-phorbol-13-acetate (TPA)-induced activation of ERK1 and 2 without affecting EGF-induced Raf activation. In separate experiments, they also showed that MLK3 phosphorylated and activated MEK-1 but that MLK3 still inhibited ERK12 phosphorylation, leading the authors to conclude that cells expressing constitutively active MLK3 are characterized by an uncoupling of ERK and MEK activities. Further experiments indicated that inhibition of JNKs (by JNK inhibitor I or II) or MLK3 (by CEP-11004) alleviated the inhibition of ERKs by overexpressed MLK3. These results were further supported by the reversal of MLK3-induced ERKs inhibition in cells expressing active MLK3 and one of two forms of dominant negative c-Jun: TAM-67 or DBM-3. The investigators imply that expression of constitutively active MLK3 results in continual JNK activation and consequently increases Jun-mediated transcription. The chronic activation of JNKs results in the disruption of MEK1-to-ERKs signaling, leading to decreased growth factor- and mitogen-stimulated activation of ERKs.
Although interesting, these data are probably insufficient to generalize a completely friendly or antagonistic relationship between JNKs and ERKs in all cell or tissue types under all conditions; the overexpression of MLK3 is as yet of uncertain physiological significance. The JNKII inhibitor might not specifically target JNKs (i.e., JNKII inhibitor might affect other kinases activity as well), and the dominant negative forms of c-Jun or inhibition of c-Jun could have nonspecific effects with other transcription factors, such as retinoic acid receptors (12) or glucocorticoid receptors (13) , and may not specifically inhibit JNKc-Jun activity.
The results of Shen et al. are partially supported by those of Black et al. (14), who found that signaling through the ERKs is markedly decreased in v-Juntransformed chicken embryonic fibroblasts (CEFs). The deletion in c-Jun that produces v-Jun, however, totally disrupts the regulation of v-Jun by the JNKs (15). Black et al. conclude that the deactivation of the ERKs in CEFs probably was due to a multitude of effects including inactivation of ERKs by MAPK phosphatases. Shen et al. concluded that phosphatases were probably not responsible for the inactivation of ERKs in their studies, suggesting that other mechanisms might be responsible. Zhang et al. (16) reported a direct physical interaction between p38
and ERK12, and that the interaction results in p38
activitydependent decreases in the phosphotransferase activity of ERK12. Little additional information is available supporting the general paradigm for JNKERK antagonism; several studies utilizing knockout cells and mice suggest that these findings are most likely cell- or tissue-type specific.
JNK knockout (Jnk/ ) mouse cells provide a more definite answer as to the relationship between JNKs and ERKs. Wildtype or Jnk/ murine embryo fibroblasts (MEFs) exhibited no difference in TNF-induced activation of p38 or ERKs in spite of a complete inhibition of tumor necrosis factor
(TNF
)-induced JNKs activity in Jnk/ MEFs (17) . In addition, TNF
-stimulated expressions of c-Jun, JunD, c-Fos, Fra1, and Fra2 proteins were markedly depressed in Jnk/ cells. Others have observed that activation of ERKs and p38s were unaffected in Jnk1/ bone marrow monocytes (18) . Using dominant negative (DN) mutants of JNKs, we showed that arsenic-, UVA-, UVC-, or TNF-
induced phosphorylation of JNKs was blocked, but that phosphorylation of the ERKs (induced under the same conditions) was not affected (1921). In addition, DN-ERK2 blocked both UVA- or arsenic-stimulated activation of ERKs but not of JNKs (19,21). Basal levels of ERK and p38 proteins are similar in Jnk1/ or Jnk2/ MEFs (22) , and when Jnk1/ or Jnk2/ cells are exposed to UVA, phosphorylation of ERKs, but not JNKs, is induced (19). On the other hand, disruption of Jnk1 in mice has little or no effect on TPA-induced phosphorylation of ERKs (23), whereas disruption of Jnk2 appeared to attenuate the TPA-induced ERK phosphorylation in mouse epidermis in vivo (23,24).
Little doubt exists that MAPKs engage in crosstalk, but the extent or direct effect of these "conversations" is unclear. Clearly, JNKs and ERKs interact under certain conditions. The interactions have been reported to be both "friendly" and "antagonistic" and the outcome is most likely related to type of stimulus received and is cell- or tissue-type dependent.
|
|
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors work was supported by The Hormel Foundation and the National Institutes of Health grants CA 81064, CA77646, CA88961, CA27502 and CA 74916.
References
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. R. Junttila, S.-P. Li, and J. Westermarck Phosphatase-mediated crosstalk between MAPK signaling pathways in the regulation of cell survival FASEB J, April 1, 2008; 22(4): 954 - 965. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Lewthwaite, E. R. Bastow, K. J. Lamb, J. Blenis, C. P. D. Wheeler-Jones, and A. A. Pitsillides A Specific Mechanomodulatory Role for p38 MAPK in Embryonic Joint Articular Surface Cell MEK-ERK Pathway Regulation J. Biol. Chem., April 21, 2006; 281(16): 11011 - 11018. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Bode and Z. Dong Inducible Covalent Posttranslational Modification of Histone H3 Sci. Signal., April 26, 2005; 2005(281): re4 - re4. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Gate, R. S. Majumdar, A. Lunk, and K. D. Tew Increased Myeloproliferation in Glutathione S-Transferase {pi}-deficient Mice Is Associated with a Deregulation of JNK and Janus Kinase/STAT Pathways J. Biol. Chem., March 5, 2004; 279(10): 8608 - 8616. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPET Journals | Pharmacological Reviews | Drug Metabolism and Disposition |
| Molecular Interventions | Molecular Pharmacology | J Pharmacology and Exp Therapeutics |